ϟϟ NSDAP was Christian ϟϟ

ϟϟ NSDAP was Christian ϟϟ



The heart and soul of the NSDAP was rooted in the deepest Christian faith. Adolf Hitler, secular documents, records, photographs, and diary entries prove this notion completely true.

Subscribers: 154

This will be a backup incase the original channel gets nuked.

The Quran says that Allah is a DECEIVER. In the following Qur'an verses, Allah reveals to us that he is the "best deceiver":

***(Qur'an 3:54)
Arabic: "ومكروا ومكر الله والله خير الماكرين"

Transliteration: "Wamakaroo wamakara Allahu waAllahu khayru almakireena"
Literal: "And they cheated/deceived and God cheated/deceived, and God (is) the best (of) the cheaters/deceivers"

(Qur'an 7:99)
Arabic: "افامنوا مكر الله فلايامن مكر الله الا القوم الخاسرون"

Transliteration: "Afaaminoo makra Allahi fala ya/manu makra Allahi illa alqawmu alkhasiroona"
Literal: "Did they secure God's scheme/deceit ? So no(one) trusts God's scheme/deceit except the nation the losers."

(Qur'an 8:30)

Arabic: "واذ يمكر بك الذين كفروا ليثبتوك او يقتلوك او يخرجوك ويمكرون ويمكر الله والله خير الماكرين"

Transliteration: "Wa-ith yamkuru bika allatheena kafaroo liyuthbitooka aw yaqtulooka aw yukhrijooka wayamkuroona wayamkuru Allahu waAllahu khayru almakireena"
Literal: "And when those who disbelieved deceive/scheme at you to affix/affirm you, or kill you, or bring you out, and they scheme/deceive , and God deceives/schemes and God (is) best (of) the deceivers/schemers."Qur'an 10:21
Qur'an 13:42
Muslims will say that "Makr" actually means to "plan" or that Allah was "planning" however numerous academic sources explain the meaning of "Makr" and how it is never used in a positive context.*Lane's Lexicon:
Edward William Lane's Arabic-English Lexicon is the most revered and scholarly English dictionary of the Arabic language. From Lane's Lexicon (the full entry can be viewed here):

***"Miim-Kaf-Ra = To practice deceit or guile or circumvention, practice evasion or elusion, to plot, to excercise art or craft or cunning, act with policy, practice strategem.

makara vb. (1)
perf. act. 3:54, 3:54, 7:123, 13:42, 14:46, 16:26, 16:45, 27:50, 40:45, 71:22
impf. act. 6:123, 6:123, 6:124, 8:30, 8:30, 8:30, 10:21, 12:102, 16:127, 27:70, 35:10
n.vb. 7:99, 7:99, 7:123, 10:21, 10:21, 12:31, 13:33, 13:42, 14:46, 14:46, 14:46, 27:50, 27:50, 27:51, 34:33, 35:10, 35:43, 35:43, 71:22
pcple. act. 3:54, 8:30"*If Allah can deceive his own believers then how is he trustworthy? God does not deceive people, only a certain fallen angel does. The First Epistle of John makes it clear, those who deny Jesus as Christ are anti-Christ. Making Judaism and Islam pretty much the same, because both are Noahidic and both deny Christ.

"Who is a liar, but he who denieth that Jesus is the Christ? This is Antichrist, who denieth the Father, and the Son." - 1 John 2:22 Duoay Rheims translation**


File:Makr Lane-Lexicon-page Vol 7-pg. 256.jpg

The Quran says that **Allah is a DECEIVER.** In the following Qur'an verses, Allah reveals to us that he is …
**Odin was queer according to Norse mythology**

Odin was queer according to Norse mythology
Odin (in the fiction) was a practitioner of Seidr, also known as effeminate magic.

«The Seithr (or Seiðr), Thul or Odin’s priesthood were in fact a ‘select’ group of men who donned effeminate robes in rituals to dance together and imitate women, who would fondle each others genitals behind screens and later bribe men from villages to perform buggery with them as part of granting ‘magical’ powers. The habits of Odin’s devotees – “involved such practices as to make people believe that Odin played the woman’s part in the sexual act. In the Norse world such an invert was regarded with disgust, but also with apprehension, for it seems to have been believed that unknown knowledge and perilous psychic force might be gained by playing such a role”»
—Foote & Wilson, The Viking Achievement, 1970390

«On the other hand, thesourcesare clear that, according to the societal norms of the Viking Age, seidr wasn’t a fitting activity for men, to say the least. According to traditional Germanic gender constructs, it was extremely shameful and dishonorable for a man to adopt a female social or sexual role. A man who practiced seidr could expect to be labeled argr (Old Norse for “unmanly;” the noun form is ergi, “unmanliness”) by his peers – one of the gravest insults that could be hurled at a Norseman.» Source

David Irving is wrong about the Table Talks
"Hitler’s Table Talk is a worthless primary source."
—Weronika Kuzniar

Irving's claim: “HITLER’S Table Talk comes from the original Bormann Vermerke which the late François Genoud purchased from Bormann’s widow Gerda Bormann. They were actually typed from notes taken by the stenographer Heinrich Heim, whom I interviewed and who confirmed the procedure in detail. Each day’s entry was initialled by Bormann at the end. They are genuine, in the first person, and highly reliable."

Rebuttal (from Kuzniar):
"This is untrue. Heim’s notes have never been authenticated, so Irving cannot possibly claim they “are genuine.” The notes are not in the “first person.” If Heim told Irving they were, then Heim lied. Indeed, Heim testified in court that he rarely took any notes while in Hitler’s presence, and most were written the next day or even days later based on his memory. As such, they are not “highly reliable.” We have Mr. Nilsson to thank for exposing all this. Without the following testimony from Heim, we might still be in the dark and dependent on Irving’s faulty assessment... May I ask again how Mr. Irving can possibly proclaim that TT is “genuine, in the first person, and highly reliable”? He was right about the Hitler Diaries being fraudulent, contrary to the “expert opinion” of Lord Dacre who had stunningly based its authentication on its own internal validity. In other words, because it sounded like Hitler, well, it must be Hitler! When the paper was later tested and the fraud exposed, Lord Dacre’s prestige took a massive blow. Imagine if Irving or some other notable historian, whether revisionist or mainstream, had exposed Lord Dacre’s other frauds? The fact that Trevor-Roper had two strikes against him – The Testament fraud and the Hitler Diaries fraud – ought to have raised many more eyebrows than have been raised vis-à-vis TT. Yet, where are the critics other than Mr. Carrier and Mr. Nilsson? We still have someone touting the TT in its own dedicated podcast series..."


ϟϟ NSDAP was Christian ϟϟ
**Hans Frank the governor of Poland was a Catholic convert.

**Hans Frank the governor of Poland was a Catholic convert.


The Pope Appeals for Hans Frank, the Holy See has appealed from Rome for clemency on behalf of Hans Frank, former Nazi-Governor General of Poland”"I am an accepted Catholic." - Hans Frank's reply when asked about his religion during an interview in Nuremberg, March 5, 1946

"*You* **cannot** make an Aryan out of Jesus, that’s **nonsense**...*Leave the hair-splitting to others. Whether it’s the Old Testament or …

"You cannot make an Aryan out of Jesus, that’s nonsense...Leave the hair-splitting to others. Whether it’s the Old Testament or the New, or simply the sayings of Jesus, it’s all the same old Jewish swindle. It will not make us free. A German church, a German Christianity is a distortion. One is either a German or a Christian. You cannot be both.
Adolf Hitler**, in Hitler Speaks

Quotes like this are found in Hermann Rauschning's memoir centered around Hitler called 'Hitler Speaks: A Series of Political Conversations with Adolf Hitler on His Real Aims' first published in 1939. It should be noted that Rauschning sought to do everything in his power to tarnish Hitler's reputation. Since that time, there have been some challenges to the authenticity of Hitler Speaks:

...In his biography of Hitler, Ian Kershaw wrote: "I have on no single occasion cited Hermann Rauschning's Hitler Speaks, a work now regarded to have so little authenticity that it is best to disregard it altogether."

"Rauschning's statements may, at best, be considered a secondary historical source. They have no documentary value." —Historian Werner Maser

Richard Steigmann-Gall also believes there is no historical value to Hitler Speaks as well, the author of the Holy Reich. Considering three respected historians disregard the memoir, it would be best for the common man to disregard it as well. Overall, Hitler Speaks is regarded as an absolute fraud from The Journal of Historical Review, Fall 1983 (Vol. 4, No. 3), pages 378-380.


In summation, the labyrinthine conundrum woven by the Goebbels and Rosenberg diaries encapsulates a narrative replete with enigmas and intricacies. The presence of inconsistencies, alterations, and questionable origins underscore the complexity of historical documents, urging us to engage in nuanced analysis rather than hasty assumptions. While correspondences with factual events might carry weight, they alone cannot definitively authenticate these diaries, leaving open the prospect of manipulated narratives crafted to shape history's perception.

**A Critical Analysis of the Goebbels and Rosenberg Diaries

Goebbels Diaries**The Goebbels diaries present a complex and intriguing puzzle within the historical context of the infamous "Kristallnacht." An apparent incongruity arises as Goebbels describes synagogues being "burned," a claim that contradicts historical records since no such destructive activities are documented. This inconsistency, coupled with Goebbels' varying portrayals of the treatment of Jews and his self-identification as a "Barbarian," strongly suggests potential manipulation and editing of the diaries over time. The very nature of these contradictions hints at a deliberate effort to craft a narrative that aligns with certain agendas, possibly extending to intentional deception of even Hitler himself.

Notably, the diaries, having fallen into Soviet hands after the war, endured a prolonged period of over 40 years locked away as curious artifacts on glass samples in Moscow before their eventual release to the public. The duration of their confinement within Soviet archives can be perceived as a curious factor, raising questions about potential motives and manipulations. This protracted period under Soviet custody, given the political climate of that era, could conceivably cast doubts on claims that these diaries were a testament to "Anti-Christian" sentiments.

The intrinsic complexity deepens further when examining the typewritten transition that Goebbels made in July 1941, which in itself could be seen as an avenue for replication, especially if the exact typewriter model used by Goebbels fell into the wrong hands. More intriguing is the handwriting aspect, a more challenging endeavor yet still within the realm of possibility. A skilled calligrapher might have been able to emulate Goebbels' handwriting, allowing for the potential manipulation of content by rearranging images of the handwriting to engineer statements that Goebbels did not actually write.

Rosenberg DiariesAnother pertinent facet emerges with the disclosure of the Rosenberg Diaries in 2013, a discovery attributed to Robert Kempner, a figure with a reputation mired in controversy due to his involvement in questionable "discoveries" such as the Wannsee Protocol and the first Posen Speech. The provenance of the Rosenberg Diaries raises skepticism, especially considering Kempner's posthumous connection to their revelation. Additionally, while the CIA, an entity of considerable influence, played a role in unearthing these diaries, inherent biases and motivations within such organizations cannot be wholly disregarded. The notion that the CIA, despite its credibility, might have an interest in shaping narratives or agendas remains a consideration.

Interestingly, the undeniable and seemingly unblemished nature of the Rosenberg Diaries has the potential to exonerate Rosenberg from alleged complicity in the NSDAP's "common plan" and, by extension, absolve him from knowledge of the Holocaust. Yet, intriguingly, Rosenberg's culpability remains unchanged in the historical record, prompting valid queries about how a prominent figure within the National Socialist framework could remain oblivious to such a significant event. The same applies to the Goebbels diaries, which, much like the Rosenberg Diaries, display a notable absence of unequivocal references to the Holocaust.

A frequent counterpoint made by proponents of the authenticity of both the Goebbels and Rosenberg diaries hinges on the occurrence of common events documented in these diaries, seemingly corroborating their veracity. However, this line of argumentation, while initially compelling, falls prey to the logical pitfalls of hasty generalization and inductive fallacy. The mere presence of congruent events, while indicative of some synchronization with historical realities, does not necessarily preclude the possibility of content manipulation or selective retention.



The so-called "Aryan" Vedic manuscripts contain nothing but perversity on the highest levels ranging from wife-beating (similar to Islam) to downright pedophilia:

Sex Slavery
Rig Veda 8:XIX:36 A gift of fifty female slaves hath Trasadasyu given me, Purukut-sa's son, Most liberal, kind, lord of the brave.

Rape / Wife Beating
Brihadâranyaka Upanishad VI:4:6. 7.
If she should not grant him his desire, he should bribe her. If she still does not grant him his desire, he should hit her with astick or with his hand, and overcome her saying: With power with glory I takeaway your glory Thus she becomes inglorious.

Minimal punishment for Rape
Manu XI:174. A man who has
committed a bestial crime, or an unnatural crimewith a female or has had intercourse in water, or with a menstruating woman, shall perform a Samtapana Krikkhra.
*Samtapana Krikkhra = period of fasting

Manu 9:94. A man, aged thirty years, shall marry a maiden of twelve who pleases him, or a man of twenty-four a girl eight years of age; if (the performance of) his duties would (otherwise) be impeded, (he must marry) sooner.

Human Sacrifice
Vishnu Purana 5:XXXVIIIARJUNA having found the bodies of Krishna and of Ráma, performed for them, and the rest of the slain, the obsequial rites. The eight queens of Krishna, who have been named, with Rukminíat their head, embraced the body of Hari, and entered the funeral fire.

To be continued...